New Media Lawyer
Independent news and comment on legal technology and new media law from Legal News Media. Issue.97 - 29.11.2001

IN THIS ISSUE
Dragon moves to new home - Tikit buys Aurra - Law Society deadline - Online contracts and the EU - Pre-budget speech & IP rights - Legal news in brief - Online legal services news - Web conferencing for lawyers - Midware bullish - Industry & Professional news - Next issue: 06.12.2001

DRAGON MOVES TO NEW HOME
The US scanning software specialist ScanSoft (best known for its OmniPage, TextBridge and PaperPort applications) has just bought the the Speech & Language Technologies division of Lernout & Hauspie in a bankruptcy auction concluded earlier this week. The deal, which still has to be approved by the Delaware Bankruptcy Court on 4 December, sees ScanSoft acquire a range of businesses - including the Dragon NaturallySpeaking product line - for $39.5 million in cash and shares.

TIKIT BUYS AURRA BACK OFFICE CONSULTANCY
The UK's Tikit Group plc this week acquired the niche back office financial and practice management systems consultancy Aurra Consulting Limited.

The Aurra acquisition further broadens Tikit's range of consultancy and services to the legal market through the addition of a highly regarded and specialist team. This team which includes Mike Bailey, who was responsible for launching the CMS Open practice management system (PMS) in the UK; Karen Bailey, who has project managed the implementation of both the market leading Elite and CMS systems in several of the largest firms in the UK; and David Gallagher, a specialist in PMS applications as well as products that add value to these systems, which include Carpe Diem time recording and the popular Whitehill reports application.

Commenting on the deal Tikit Group managing director David Lumsden said: "Aurra provides consultancy services to many of the major UK law firms. Their knowledge of the Elite and CMS practice management systems together with their ability to enhance products such as Whitehill has enabled them to build up a strong following in a very short space of time.

"Tikit have built up a successful business in delivering leading edge products and services to the legal market relating mainly to front office applications and we see the acquisition of Aurra as a strategic step to being able to fulfil our ambition to be able to support law firms in both the front and back office."

Mike Bailey of Aurra added: "This year I have noticed a considerable demand by law firms to further maximize their PMS investments, it is our aim to meet this demand from our clients by providing law firms with experienced consultants who have the ability to offer effective, independent PMS consultancy services. Significant investments have already been made implementing these systems by many of the leading firms. Aurra has the requisite expertise and experience to assist these firms in further maximizing the return on this investment.

"The acquisition of Aurra by Tikit will accelerate the rate of growth of Aurra and will enable us to attract other leading consultants to further strengthen our team in our aim of providing an expanding range of back office services to our mutual client base."

The directors of Aurra, which will now become a wholly owned subsidiary of Tikit Group plc, will continue to be employed by Aurra Consultancy Limited following the acquisition and have all entered into new service agreements with the Tikit Group.

LAW SOCIETY SOFTWARE SCHEME DEADLINE
The closing date for legal systems suppliers wishing to apply to be included in the English Law Society's year 2002 edition of its Software Solutions Guide is 30 November. Over a dozen suppliers have already applied and there is still time by emailing John Miller at John.Miller@lawsociety.org.uk

THE EU E-COMMERCE DIRECTIVE & ONLINE CONTRACTS
A commentary by Louis Joseph of Kaltons Solicitors...

The EU E-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC), which is due to be implemented on 16 January 2002, impinges very much on online contracts. Articles 9, 10, 11 and Recitals 34-39 deal with the 'Contracts Concluded By Electronic Means'. The Directive, according to DTI, requires Member States to remove any prohibitions or restrictions on the use of electronic contracts, with certain permitted exceptions. When the contract is concluded between a business and a consumer via a we bsite (but not when it is concluded between businesses - where they have otherwise agreed - or wholly by email), the service provider must provide certain information to make clear before the consumer places his order what steps the consumer must take, how the full terms and conditions may be accessed and stored and how the consumer can spot and correct technical errors. Providers of information society services have to acknowledge receipt of the order, and order and receipt are deemed to be received when the recipients can access them Articles 9, 10, 11.

The Directive in essence provides that Member States must ensure that their legal system allows contracts to be concluded by electronic means. Moreover, they must ensure that the legal requirements applicable to the contractual process neither create obstacles for the use of electronic contracts nor result in such contracts being deprived of legal effectiveness and validity on account of their having been made by electronic means.

However, exceptions may be made in the following areas:
* contracts that create or transfer rights in real estate, except for rental rights;
* contracts requiring by law the involvement of courts, public authorities or professions exercising public authority;
* contracts of suretyship granted and on collateral securities furnished by persons acting for purposes outside their trade, business or profession;
* contracts governed by family law or by the law of succession.

In respect of consumer contracts, e-commerce merchants (service providers) must provide consumers (but not businesses) at least the following information, prior to the order being placed by the recipient of the service:
* the different technical steps to follow to conclude the contract;
* whether or not the concluded contract will be filed by the service provider and whether it will be accessible;
* the technical means for identifying and correcting input errors prior to the placing of the order;
* the languages offered for the conclusion of the contract.

Furthermore, service providers must indicate to consumers any relevant codes of conduct to which they subscribe and information on how those codes can be consulted electronically. Contract terms and general conditions must also provided to the recipient, in a way that allows him to store and reproduce them.

Member States must also ensure where consumers of services place their orders through technological means, the following principles apply:
* the service provider has to acknowledge the receipt of the recipient's order without undue delay and by electronic means;
* the order and the acknowledgement of receipt are deemed to be received when the parties to whom they are addressed are able to access them.

Finally, Member States must ensure that service providers make available to consumers appropriate, effective and accessible technical means allowing them to identify and correct input errors, prior to the placing of the order.

The spirit of the Directive in respect of online contracts is expressed in Recitals 34-39 which in essence provide that each Member State must amend its legislation containing requirements, and in particular requirements as to form, which are likely to curb the use of contracts by electronic means. The result of such amendments should be to make contracts concluded electronically workable. However, the Directive does not affect Member States' possibility of maintaining or establishing general or specific legal requirements for contracts which can be fulfilled by electronic means, in particular requirements concerning secure electronic signatures.

Moreover, Member States may maintain restrictions for the use of electronic contracts with regard to contracts requiring by law the involvement of courts, public authorities, or professions exercising public authority; this possibility also covers contracts which require the involvement of courts, public authorities, or professions exercising public authority in order to have an effect with regard to third parties as well as contracts requiring by law certification or attestation by a notary.

The UK Government's concern and approach in this regards was outlined by the DTI as follows: 'The Government is still considering whether form requirements (e.g. notices or copy documents) must be disapplied, such as those which have to be satisfied for a contract to be enforceable and where the context makes it clear that a physical instrument is required. If so, this could require considerable amendment of the legislation concerned. On the information to be given by providers of information society services to consumers and the placing of the order, we propose to follow the Directive closely. The provisions were negotiated keeping in mind existing best practice and the need to minimise regulatory burdens.'

Four matters caused specific concerns to DTI. Thus, DTI enquired as follows:
* How should it be determined when a service provider has acknowledged receipt of the customer's order?
* Could the requirement for a form that can be stored and reproduced be satisfied by the sending of an e-mail to the recipient?
* Given that the point at which the order and the acknowledgement of receipt will be deemed to be received has been defined in the Directive in such a way as to avoid technologically specific terms relating to the time that the data enter the recipient's information system (e.g. stored on a server or available in his e-mail inbox.), DTI queried whether there any likely circumstances in which it might not be straightforward to identify the point at which the parties to whom these messages are addressed are able to access them.
* Is there any need to specify for all cases the point at which the contract is concluded?

There is little doubt that the development of e-commerce within Europe (and certainly globally) is hampered by a number of legal obstacles to its proper functioning, thereby making it difficult to conduct e-trading with ease. Equally, there is little doubt that these obstacles arise from divergences in legislation and from the legal uncertainty as to which national rules apply to such services. To a very large extent the E-Commerce Directive seeks to overcome some of these obstacles by harmonising certain national laws and by clarifying certain legal concepts to the extent necessary for the proper functioning of e-commerce in the EU. To that extent it is most welcome.

PRE-BUDGET SPEECH GOOD FOR IP INDUSTRY
This week's pre-budget report by the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown includes proposals for draft legislation on a new regime for providing relief to companies for the costs of intellectual property, goodwill and other intangible assets. John Slater, the managing partner at Marks & Clerk, the UK's largest firm of patent & trademark attorneys, has welcomed the move: "The proposed relief for companies investing in intellectual property will provide a welcome shot in the arm for British business. Intellectual property is gaining in profile, and more and more organisations are recognising its value to their business. The proposed changes to the tax system will spur innovation and invention, and reflect more accurately the increased emphasis on knowledge-based assets in the UK economy. In future mergers and acquisitions, this measure will put investment in intellectual property on an equal footing with investment in other business assets."

LEGAL NEWS IN BRIEF
NOMINET DECISION NOW ONLINE - The first decision under Nominet UK's new dispute resolution service has been published online. In the case of Eli Lilly and Company -v- David Clayton over the disputed domain name xigris.co.uk, the independent expert Tony Willoughby, of Willoughby & Partners, found in favour of Eli Lilly. For more details visit www.nominet.org.uk/drs/decisions.html

DON'T PANIC, SAY DLA - UK law firm DLA is advising companies who receive a software audit form from the Business Software Alliance to pProceed with care when deciding whether to complete it. According to DLA, anyone who returns the form in good faith "could simply be providing the BSA with the evidence it needs to take action against you". The BSA recently sent all UK organisations with 20 or more employees a "2001 Software Audit Return" with a deadline of 30 November for responses and includes a notice to treat the document "as seriously as a tax return". DLA says the approach taken by the BSA makes the document look like an official process which companies are required to comply with. But the BSA has no power to force companies to complete the form, being a private body, not a regulatory one.

MICROSOFT GENERAL COUNSEL RETIRES - Bill Neukom, Microsoft's general counsel,has announced his plans to retire from the company at the end of the current fiscal year. He will be replaced by Microsoft's current deputy general counsel Brad Smith. Neukom joined Microsoft in 1985 but actually started advising the company back in 1979 when his then law partner Bill Gates Jnr (the father of Microsoft founder Bill Gates) asked him to help out his son's company. Brad Smith, who joined Microsoft in 1993 from Covington & Burling, where he had been specialising in antitrust and IP work, will be responsible for a law and corporate affairs department employing almost 600 staff.

CD ANTI-COPYING MOVE BACKFIRES - Complaints about the anti-copying technology (designed to prevent the album being burned or copied onto a blank CD) on the CD version of Natalie Imbruglia's latest album 'White Lilies Island' have forced her record label to issue replacements to angry customers. Her label, BMG Entertainment, said it had set up a hotline for UK customers who were having trouble playing the disc in some PC CD and DVD players. The disc will be replaced by retailers or by the label itself.

SUPREME COURT NOW REVIEWING ONLINE SMUT CASE The US Supreme Court has this week begun considering a First Amendment dispute surrounding the constitutionality of the 1999 Child Online Protection Act. This attempts to protect children from unsuitable material on the web while avoiding any restrictions on the freedom of speech.

SPACEY LOSES HIS PLACE IN CYBERSPACE Movie actor Kevin Spacey has lost a court battle over ownership of www.kevinspacey.com domain name. Judge Gary Feess, of the US District Court of the Central District of California, ruled on 14 November that if Mr Spacey wished to take ownership of the domain to court he would have to file in a Canadian court, where its current owner - the well known cybersquatter Jeffrey Burgar resides. According to the court, under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act 1999, US Congress accepted that as long as there is no attempt to sell on a "personal name" web site for profit, then it is an example of "fair use" and permission is not needed from the individual in question. The decision does prompt the question - why didn't Spacey just go to domain arbitrators, such as WIPO or the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) and take advantage of theit Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy. There again Burgar won a previous WIPO case in almost identical circumstances over the domain www.brucespringsteen.com.

ONLINE LEGAL SERVICES NEWS
CLASS ACTIONS - Canada based Class Action Services Ltd has launched a new service for individuals wanting to locate class actions they may be eligible to join. The umbrella site is at www.worldjustice.com and there are three sub sites: www.bigclassaction.com where people can register a new or join an existing class action, www.worldadvocacy.com a definitive listing of advocacy groups, and www.classactionnotification.com, a service for the legal community.

FAMILY LAW LIST GOES PUBLIC - Divorce-online in the UK has announced the launch to the general public of its new Solicitors Directory for Family Law Departments. The Directory allows users to search by post code or town for firms with a family law practice and to then book an appointment with the selected firm. All firms will receive a basic listing free of charge however for an additional £150.00 pa fee firms can buy a 'featured listing' which not only provides additional information about a firm but also ensures it is higher placed in any searched results.

Divorce-online's operations director Mark Keenan said all paid for listings would be rotated randomly to prevent the alphabetical disadvantage found in some directories. Also, he added, unlike some other online directories there are no referral fees. Divorce-online has consistently been one of the UK's most frequently visited legal web sites. www.divorce-online.co.uk

SITE FOR INHOUSE LAWYERS - Martindale-Hubbell has launched a new web site providing a range of free resources for inhouse legal departments and corporate counsel worldwide. Along with Martindale-Hubbell's Lawyer Locator system, which provides access to a database of more than one million lawyers and law firms in 160 different countries, users can find reports on the proceedings of the Counsel To Counsel series of forums that Martindale now runs throughout the United States, Europe and Asia, plus the Martindale-Hubbell Dispute Resolution Directory of organisations offering alternative dispute resolution (ADR) services. www.corporate.martindale.com

WEB CONFERENCING FOR LAWYERS
Chicago based ClaimResolver Inc has launched what it believes is the first web conferencing program designed specifically for lawyers. Designed and built in conjunction with Ernst & Young Litigation Advisory Services, it contains a number of features to meet the needs of lawyers including increased participant identification, a program to help participants negotiate settlements, special templates for documenting agreements reached and a teleconferencing service that allows parties to have private side bar discussions. Recording and archiving facilities are not available because of the potential privilege and discovery concerns they create. The service is entirely internet based and requires no capital investment, subscription charges or special software - fees are charged on a per user, per minute basis.

It all sounds a great idea but as Leon de Costa, one of the founders of the Freelawyer and eSettle services in the UK points out "There are significant productivity benefits involved in such a system. However the challenge will be to convince a legal profession, that is paid by the hour, that efficiency gains are desirable." www.claimnegotiator.com

MIDWARE BULLISH ABOUT FUTURE
Responding to questions at the company's recent annual general meeting, Mark Flack, the chief executive officer of the Australian legal systems supplier Midware reported that the company had experienced strong sales growth during the July to October period and operating revenues have exceeded budgets by fifteen percent. The revenue growth was a result of strong sales in a period that is customarily slower than the peak January to June sales period.

Midware has seen its acquisition of the Queensland software and consulting business IMAC Support Services, legal practice management developer Law Ledger and document management distributor Client Server Computing start to yield results. "These businesses have now all been integrated into the Midware organisation and already we are seeing tangible benefits", said Flack.

"Given the prevailing economic conditions, the firm is heartened to see its sales pipelines at all time high levels. Whilst our competitors are resorting to discounting, Midware has been able to maintain prices and margins and still increase sales volume. This just shows the strength of the organisation and reflects the foresight that the firm has displayed in understanding and adapting to the changing technology needs of law firms". With a strong sales period behind it, Midware believes it is nicely positioned to take advantage of the traditionally busier January to June sales period.

INDUSTRY & PROFESSIONAL NEWS
A TERMINAL SOLUTION - Knowledge Technology Solutions (020 8795 2700) has launched a realtime financial information terminal for law firm corporate finance teams. Called MarketTerminal, it can be accessed via the internet on a standard PC or laptop and its use of ASP architecture means it has a low entry level price of £200 per month, per user. www.ktsplc.com

MAPS TO GO ONLINE - Sitescope, the parent of Homecheck, a provider of online environmental risk information to the conveyancing market, has signed a deal with Ordnance Survey that will lead to the creation of the UK's largest online map library. The project involves scanning and capturing data from thousands of large scale Ordnance Survey maps dating back to 1840 to provide a record of how the country has been developed over the past 160 years. Sitescope believe the maps will provide an essential resource for the property, construction and environmental sectors as well as central and local government. Sitescope is undertaking the project in conjunction with GIS and data capture specialist InfoTech Enterprises Europe. Sitescope plan to have the data available via Homecheck's web services during the first half of 2002. www.homecheck.co.uk

IS YOUR EMAIL SYSTEM SECURE - Internet security specialist GFI has launched an Email Security Testing Zone to enable organizations to check whether their email systems are vulnerable to hackers and similar forms of security risks. The zone - at www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/ - allows visitors to discover instantly if their system is secure against current and future email threats, such as emails containing infected attachments, emails with malformed MIME headers and HTML emails with embedded scripts.

NEW E-LAW JOURNAL FOR SCOTLAND - The Scottish legal publisher W.Green this week launched the E-Law Review, a new e-commerce law newsletter aimed at the Scottish market. The newsletter is being published in association with the Scottish Society for Computers & Law and the Shepherd & Wedderburn Centre for Intellectual Property & Technology (SCRIPT).

E-BOOK PUBLISHER'S BOOK OUT SOON - In February, Texere Publishing will publish "The Agent - personalities, politics & publishing" by Arthur Klebanoff. Klebanoff is the literary agent who spotted a loophole in publishing contracts that apparently allows authors to resll the electronic rights to their books if they were not already covered in the original contract. He subsequently set up Rosetta Books which became in a legal dispute with Random House on who owned the electronic rights to books by Kurt Vonnegut, among others. Appropriately enough Texere has secured the electronic rights to "The Agent".

Top of Page